{"id":161,"date":"2005-06-27T20:07:36","date_gmt":"2005-06-28T04:07:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.otherthings.com\/grafarc\/blog2\/?p=161"},"modified":"2005-06-27T20:07:36","modified_gmt":"2005-06-28T04:07:36","slug":"the-archaeologists-weigh-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/2005\/06\/the-archaeologists-weigh-in\/","title":{"rendered":"The archaeologists weigh in"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It had to happen eventually.<\/p>\n<p>When I named this site, I was kind of groping for words, and stumbled on a phrase that seemed to capture this whole timelapse photocollage thing: &#8220;Graffiti Archaeology&#8221;.  It seemed like a good fit, since it conveyed a sense of history, study, and attention to detail.  And I felt the work I was doing was at least <i>analogous<\/i> to the most well-known aspect of what archaeologists do: carefully removing newer layers of stuff to reveal the older stuff underneath, and studying it.  I did wonder, though, what real archaeologists would think of the project.  Would they scoff, or would they gush, or would they engage critically with the idea?<\/p>\n<p>The answer, apparently, is all of the above.<\/p>\n<p>A few weeks ago, I got a wonderful email from Sarah May, a contemporary archaeologist working for <a target=\"_new\" href=\"http:\/\/www.english-heritage.org.uk\">English Heritage<\/a>.  Her field of study, she wrote, was railway lines, and our site had inspired her to start documenting graffiti as well.  I asked her what her specific interest was, and she wrote &#8220;My interest in railways is rubbish.&#8221;  I thought that was awfully self-effacing of her, until I read on and realized she was being literal.  &#8220;The distinctive nature of rubbish on railways, its distribution patterns and what these things tell us about railways as place and non-places.  Yes archaeologists are odd.&#8221;  Odd indeed, but my kind of odd!<\/p>\n<p>Today, <a target=\"_new\" href=\"http:\/\/archaeoastronomy.co.uk\/?p=356\">Alun<\/a>, a Phd student specializing in archaeoastronomy, brought a different perspective.  He critiqued our site for its lack of discussion and evaluation, saying that without that, it can&#8217;t be true archaeology.  (Others don&#8217;t seem as bothered by this: <a target=\"_new\" href=\"http:\/\/lxmack.blogspot.com\/2005\/06\/grafitti-archaeology.html\">Alexandra Mack<\/a>, an anthropologist, thinks it&#8217;s a fair term, and <a target=\"_new\" href=\"http:\/\/savageminds.org\/2005\/06\/27\/suspirium-puellarum-celadus-thraex\/\">Savage Minds<\/a> agrees.)<\/p>\n<p>Alun&#8217;s critique highlights what&#8217;s currently missing from the site: a way for us to add metadata to our layers, beyond just place names and dates.  Utimately I&#8217;d like the photocollages to act as a foundation on which to build all kinds of narratives: for example, the story of one writer&#8217;s career, told chronologically by jumping from spot to spot; or the story of an epic battle between crews; or just the story of what it was like the night a certain piece got painted.<\/p>\n<p>This is something we&#8217;ve always intended for the site, but it&#8217;s not a simple task and we haven&#8217;t had time to do a proper job of it.   In the meantime, various threads of narrative are spinning into existence over in our <a target=\"_new\" href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/groups\/grafarc\">Flickr group<\/a>.  I hope some day soon we can weave it all together.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It had to happen eventually. When I named this site, I was kind of groping for words, and stumbled on a phrase that seemed to capture this whole timelapse photocollage thing: &#8220;Graffiti Archaeology&#8221;. It seemed like a good fit, since it conveyed a sense of history, study, and attention to detail. And I felt the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-global-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grafarc.org\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}